Sick(o) in America

John Stossel picks up the gauntlet that Michael Moore threw down, and slaps him silly with it; in less time than it takes to watch the overrated ‘documentary’ Sicko. Here’s a quote from the online article,

There are many problems with health insurance, but that doesn’t mean we should put the government in control. If it’s decided that health care should be paid for with tax dollars, then it’s up to the government to decide how that money should be spent. There’s only so much money to go around, so the inevitable result is rationing.

It’s just the law of supply and demand. Lowering prices increases demand. Lowering the price to nothing pushes demand through the roof. Author P.J. O’Rourke said it best: “If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free.”

When health care is free, governments deal with all that increased demand by limiting what’s available.

20/20 – StosselAmerican Health Care in Critical Condition

I have watched both Sicko and Stossel’s 20/20 special. While the interviews with the individuals struggling with the problems of the healthcare system were emotionally compelling in Sicko; as usual, the emotional argument is used to blind the viewer to the real culprit in the problem.

Sick in America, John Stossel’s response to Sicko, lacks none of the passion that Micheal Moore pours into his film, and yet deals in clear truths and verifiable facts. He discovers the real culprit behind the healthcare crisis. The real culprit is government.

The Canadians lamenting the lack of insurance coverage in the US is a classic example of using emotion to obscure the real problem. Why doesn’t the Canadian socialized system pay for services rendered in the US? Or any other country? If it was truly free service for their citizens, it would be free wherever the need arose. This is true of all the socialized healthcare systems across the world. There is no charge to the end user, provided he goes to a funded provider; and that’s the catch. The government pays for the service through taxes, and rations the healthcare that is available based on the funds that are provided.

This is also why drugs are cheaper in other countries. Prices are artificially lowered through agreements with those countries single payer systems. This should explain why the pharmaceutical companies don’t want to you to import Canadian drugs into the US. At some point they will simply stop providing the medication at reduced prices, since they can no longer profit from it’s production. Profit is why anyone engages in business in the first place, and healthcare is a business.

The one thing Moore got correct in Sicko was the scathing criticism of the current health insurance system. Once again, he missed the real culprit. Government regulation has created the current health insurance system. HMO, PPO, etc. Just more three letter acronyms for government created systems. If you agree to be covered by an HMO, then they, like the government in other countries, tell you who can treat you and for what.

I love the fact that he spent so much time in Europe. What a beacon of economic health France and the other European economies are. I also love the way he never addresses how much they pay in taxes for the lavish services provided. Sadly, it’s not that much more than we do here in the US for the lack of services that we have. That doesn’t mean we should pay more for better service. Logic should dictate that we demand to pay less, and provide our own ‘safety net’.

Let’s make something clear here; we are not Kaiser Permanente (Moore’s whipping boy of choice) In fact, the healthcare industry itself is not Kaiser Permanente. Based on the criminal behavior documented concerning Kaiser Permanente, I would think there would be charges filed somewhere against them. But then, their behavior is regulated and endorsed by the government. The same government that Moore thinks we should hand over the rest of healthcare to.

Only a dedicated socialist, like Micheal Moore, would consider it an indictment that we provide healthcare to prisoners, people held against their will (and as far as Gitmo detainees are concerned, held without charges) prisoners have no ability to provide for themselves, while citizens of the US do without healthcare; and, of course, the Cuban government bent over backward at Moore’s request to treat his boatload of sick people. What a media coup that is. Cuba heals the sick overlooked by America’s evil capitalist system. Especially the neglected Ground Zero workers.

My sister spent several years at Ground Zero, helping with the clean up effort. She, along with thousands of others still suffer from the after effects of being exposed to the air around Ground Zero. Health problems that the government still denies has anything to do with working at Ground Zero. The government has lead the way towards disenfranchising those heroes of Ground Zero. The insurance companies are simply following the government’s lead, just like they always have.

Except that the system might be evil, but it most certainly isn’t capitalist. All of the government managed systems are no different from the fascist corporatism of Il Duce‘s Italy; just another variant of socialism. Yes, the system currently in place is already a compromise. See how well it’s working? Don’t you want more of the same?

I’d like to speak for a significant portion of America’s uninsured. We don’t want universal health care. Some of us are uninsured by choice. The cost of insurance outweighs the benefit provided by insurance. (The only way the cost is justifiable is if a family member has some long term expensive-to-treat disease, and then the insurance company disallows coverage based on some obscure clause in the policy. I have seen this happen before) Forcing us to contribute to a universal system through a greater tax burden will simply drive us further into poverty. We want the freedom to choose what we want insured, and to get the same tax benefits as any other insurance provider. We want to negotiate prices directly with our doctors and hospitals, and we want the choice to remain uninsured if we deem it necessary.

Let charity provide the ‘free’ services. Only charity really can. All other arrangements involve the use of force on one or another of various groups. This is unacceptable to those of us who believe force should not be involved in normal social relationships.

It’s worth mentioning that I followed the sentiment of Michael Moore in his film, and refused to pay for the privilege of viewing his film, just as he does not wish to pay for the privilege of getting healthcare service. Instead I found an alternative source for the material. Anybody with access to a torrent program may do the same. I don’t reward thieves for promoting government as their method of choice.

John Stossel’s special has been broken into segments and is available on YouTube. Let him know you support his views by contacting him at ABC. There’s also a blog entry over at Downsize DC on the subject of the healthcare system, as well as an entire section of the website over at CATO.

CATO Weekly Video on the subject of “Sicko”

There really is no excuse to be uninformed on the subject.


2019. Hard to believe that the guy who wrote this was applying for disability while he was typing it. Most of my early writings on the subject of government programs have proven to be misguided at best, hypocritical at worst. Hypocritical, like the above post. Another one of those posts that I’d rather hit the delete button on than write an apology for. Oh well. The Bowl of Crow covers this too.

I still don’t think much of Michael Moore or his documentaries. It just so happens that his opponents are even more jaded and hypocritical than he is. Just watch anything by Stossel since joining FOX news and you will see just how dishonest his presentations have become. Possibly always were.

To use the phrase socialized medicine is to repeat oneself needlessly. All medicine contains costs borne by the public at large. All of it. It is a classic case of an economic externality, which is why businesses toss the cost of healthcare around like a hot potato. No one wants to foot the bill, therefore everyone must be forced to foot the bill. How that cost is paid equitably, while providing access to limited facilities equitably? How can these costs and benefits be spread across the world, granting every living person access? Those are the really hard and important questions. Questions that I am finally fully cognizant of lacking the knowledge and expertise to solve. It’s about fucking time, if I do say so myself.

The Beancounter Mentality

A quote from the Article iPhone & iPod: contain or disengage?“:

“Apple has to always remember that simply making money CANNOT be its point of existence. The point of any company should be to make customers want to give it money, NOT to get money from customers. It’s a subtle distinction that is the difference between good and evil.”

read more | digg story

This is a subtle but important error that most of corporate America commits, on a regular basis. Nothing longer than the end of the next quarter matters to the average accountant in a large corporation (which gets back to my previous observation about large corporations and innovation) I have watched this particular progression occur over and over in the corporate world, as the accountants convince the managers that their distorted view of the bottom line is the only view that counts.

…and then the finger pointing concerning who’s to blame for the company loosing market share begins.

DownsizeDC.org Blog | The Future

The Future of the US in Iraq, that is. I predicted the permanence of our involvement in Iraq on the day that GWB invaded the country (and it didn’t take a crystal ball to see that development in advance) Downsize DC doesn’t think permanent occupation of Iraq is a good idea. Neither do I. Here’s a quote:

President Bush wants us to stay in Iraq forever, like we have in Korea. He may get his way, no matter who wins the election in 2008. The same dynamics will still be at work on January 20, 2009. The new President will be afraid to be the one who lost Iraq. We have been here before.


read more | digg story

My I’m not afraid letter:

I refuse to sacrifice my rights (any of them) on the pretext that the next attack can be stopped. The next ‘real’ attack (I do not count faux attacks, such as the one purported to smuggle explosive liquids onto airliners, to be real attacks. That was a media event, not a potential attack) does not face any better chance of being stopped by any of the current procedures than the 9-11 attacks could have been stopped.

The war on terror is not a winnable war, because there is no definable point at which we can be said to be victorious; it is a war on a tactic, which can be employed by anyone willing to use those means to achieve an end. The result is a never ending war that drains the treasury and debilitates the military and the spirit of America.

Bring the troops home. All of them. End the war on terror. Re-formulate our foreign policy so as to eliminate the chance of blowback. Only then will we be truly safe from terrorism, because there will be no need for terrorists to target us.

9-11 Truth & Pyromaniacs in the Reichstag

Stepping back from the previous posts on the subject of 9-11 (well, other than the rebuild ’em post, that is. The effort to get the twin towers rebuilt may or may not be going anywhere, but it remains the right thing to do) The latest alert from Downsize DC says it all:

Here is the truth, with a little “t,” about 9-11: It was a day of massive government failure. No one in government, and no institution of the government, was held accountable, or paid any price, for this failure. The federal government, and the people who run it, were actually rewarded for their failure on 9-11, instead of being held accountable.

…And most importantly:

It makes zero sense that the Bush administration would have been capable of such a massive crime, but incapable, a few months later, of planting WMD’s in Iraq. On this basis alone, most of the 9-11 conspiracy theories are non-starters.

read more | digg story

Which sums up the argument against the popular conspiracy theories quite nicely, while at the same time pointing out the governments possible/probable duplicity in allowing the attacks to occur in the first place.

Day of Deceit outlines, in various forms, how the Pearl Harbor attacks were allowed to occur despite several warning signs that should have been evident; and that the attacks were even desired and encouraged, leaving the pacific fleet out as bait for the attacks, while FDR and the Naval department put it’s 8 point plan into action, luring the Japanese into committing the aggression so that we could enter the war with public support. Whether or not you buy into all of the claims in the book, these hard facts are beyond dispute.

Why then is it so hard to believe that something similar occurred on 9-11?

Which brings me to the film that I should have promoted when I instead blogged on the subject of Loose Change.

9-11 Press for Truth. I have yet to see the entire film, but if the trailer is truly an example of the film’s content, then it’s something I want to see, and most Americans need to see.

read more | digg story

This subject dovetails nicely with the latest offering from Dan Carlin. If Pearl Harbor lead the way for our entry into WWII, then 9-11 leads directly to Bush granting himself near dictatorial powers in the event of an emergency, as was discussed in Dan Carlin’s podcast.

From WorldnetDaily:

President Bush, without so much as issuing a press statement, on May 9 signed a directive that granted near dictatorial powers to the office of the president in the event of a national emergency declared by the president.
The “National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive,” with the dual designation of NSPD-51, as a National Security Presidential Directive, and HSPD-20, as a Homeland Security Presidential Directive, establishes under the office of president a new National Continuity Coordinator.
That job, as the document describes, is to make plans for “National Essential Functions” of all federal, state, local, territorial, and tribal governments, as well as private sector organizations to continue functioning under the president’s directives in the event of a national emergency.

The directive loosely defines “catastrophic emergency” as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions.”


Which means the sitting president can declare an emergency pretty much anytime he wants.

Don’t hold your breath, because this isn’t the end of the problem. The next terrorist attack is just around the corner (all the pundits agree on this fact) and the next terrorist attack will most likely result in the end of the US as we know it, although imperial Washington may continue stumbling along for quite some time afterwards.

At what point does freedom cease to exist? How long can we continue to insist that we are a ‘free people’, when every day some other limitation on our freedoms is established by a government that only “wants to keep us safe”?

Time to fall back on that other Franklin quote about Security and Freedom. I’m sure you’ve heard it.


I have eaten a Big Bowl of Crow since publishing this and other thoughts on many subjects.  If you didn’t come here from this post, you probably should go check that one out before drawing any conclusions. Resisting the urge to press delete on this entire post. The stupidity.  It hurts.

Perhaps they should Read the Bills first

Here’s a quote from Senator Dianne Feinstein (credit to DownsizeDC blog) on the subject:

“Unbeknownst to any of us, in March 2006, in the PATRIOT Act reauthorization, a provision was included that allows the Attorney General to appoint an interim U.S. attorney for an indefinite period of time.”

Maybe she should have read the bill she voted for, before she and her reckless colleagues turned it into law.

Now she wants to undo it by passing another law. I wonder if she’ll read that one? It would be even better if she wrote it.

Doesn’t it make sense that congress should read and write the bills they vote on? Want to tell them this yourself? Drop by Downsize DC and send a message concerning the Read the Bills act and the Write the Laws act.

If you want to preserve your right to speak to your congressman through an organization like DownsizeDC, then you might also want to talk to your congressman about their attempts to stifle grassroots organizations with regulation.

Let them know what “shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech” really means. Clearly they don’t understand it themselves.


If the idea of congressmen voting on legislation they didn’t write and haven’t read doesn’t scare the pants off of you, then perhaps you should wander over and give The Late, Great American Nation a read.

If that doesn’t do it, I don’t think anything else will.

George Bush is Leeroy Jenkins

“Alright chums, let’s do this! LEEEROY JENNNNNKINS!” Pretty much covers my thoughts on the subject of Bush and Iraq (credit to Kung Fu Monkey: Shorter Bush for the idea)

“W” rushes in where even is hawklike father, HW, refused to go.

Or, to quote Wil Wheaton:

Iraq Study Group: Sir, you’ve totally screwed the pooch on this one, so here are some things you can do to get out of this war with some serious cover. It’ll limit casualties, and maybe even help save your legacy a little bit.

Bush: Yeah, about that. I know that was pretty much the whole point of your little study and stuff, but I’m not so much going to listen to anything you suggested as I am going to do the complete opposite. See, I’m the decider. That means that I get to decide what to do, and I don’t have to listen to anyone else if I don’t want to. That’s what deciders do: they decide. Mission Accomplished. God bless me. Uh, I mean, America. Yeah, God bless America. Heh. Heh.

There is a mandate out there to bring the troops home and abandon the conflict in Iraq. The war was over when Saddam was toppled, and the current conflict cannot be won. It can’t be won because it’s a conflict that existed before we got there, and will exist after we leave. It’s a conflict between groups living within the borders of Iraq, a country created by men who never lived there, men who just drew what was essentially random lines on a map. (incidentally, this is the precise reason cited by George H.W. Bush when asked why he did not remove Saddam Hussein. The foregone conclusion that this would lead to a bloody civil war) These people are going to keep fighting until they learn to live together, and no amount of external pressure will make this come about.

The Decider just doesn’t realize that he’s about to become less popular than Nixon if he doesn’t change course, and soon.

ALD: The US Mint says “No Accounts for You”

Bernard von NotHaus revealed on FMNN’s eRadio last Friday that the US Mint has apparently taken action against NORFED behind the scenes as well as publicly.

To go along with the harassment that the Liberty Dollar and NORFED are enduring in the press, as well as the false accusations posted on the Mint’s website, Bernard revealed on the podcast posted Monday that the US Mint has acted to have bank accounts associated with NORFED and the Liberty Dollar closed, making it extremely hard for the American Liberty Dollar to conduct business.

This ratchets the battle between ALD and the US Mint up another notch.

Where it goes from here is anybodies guess. As Bernard states, CBS’ hatchet job on the subject suggests that it’s a crime even to possess ALD (it categorically is not a crime to own silver or ALD) much less use it. I’m quite certain that if they intended to arrest anyone for using ALD, they would have done so already.

Silver is up again today, once again going over 13 dollars an ounce, spot price. My suggestion is, buy silver.


Here’s the issue of Liberty Dollar News that discusses the latest developments. As an aside, the Associate of the month, Jon Roland, is a personal friend of mine. Wander by Constitution.org and check out the volumes of work that Jon has put in on the subject of liberty and the Constitution.

LIBERTY DOLLAR NEWS: November 2006 Vol. 8 No. 11

CALL TO ACTION:

Contact the media: Urge the media to report on the Liberty Dollar!

As you will read below, Mike Johnson has resigned, which is why I am back writing the news, your chronicle about the life and times of the Liberty Dollar. This issue is yet another blockbuster with shocking news and developments that nobody considered possible. It is also a call to action for individuals and organizations that support the ideals that the Liberty Dollar symbolizes. I urge you to not only read this Newsletter but I also urge you to contact the newspapers, publications, and organizations that you respect to report on the Liberty Dollar. Very quickly, we need to build a broader base to take action in support of the Liberty Dollar. Without meaningful action the Liberty Dollar could become extinct in a short period of time…

IMPORTANT…THIS JUST IN: Help… a few self-described experts, working through Wikipedia, are at it again. This time they’ve added a Pros and Cons section on the Liberty Dollar. While this Wikipedia article is more accurate than earlier versions, it still needs to be updated. Please take a moment and post a quick comment (hopefully to the “Pro” section!) at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Dollar#Pros_.26_Cons_of_Liberty_Dollars.

Thank you for your continued support, one dollar at a time. Now the BIG news…[/size]

WAIT: I forgot to mention the upcoming Liberty Dollar University-12 in San Jose from January 10 – 13. If you want to find out what is going on and influence the direction of the Liberty Dollar… you have to come to LDU-12! Call the office now for a reservation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

  1. Liberty Dollar Faces Extinction
  2. Mike Johnson Resigns
  3. Treasury Letters
  4. Bernard’s “Second Law of Money”
  5. New Vanity Number: 888.LIB.DOLLAR
  6. Hawaii Dala Announced
  7. Signs and Shirts by Jeff
  8. Letter / Article to the Editor
  9. Success Story / Incident of the Month
  10. Question of the Month
  11. Liberty Associate of the Month
  12. Quote of the Month

1. Liberty Dollar Faces Extinction

The Liberty Dollar is now under attack from… our bank. On Monday, November 20, the Evansville office received a certified letter from our bank, Old National Bank, which said: “Please be advised that if you do not close the Account within 15 days of the date of this letter (11.16.06), Old National
Bank will exercise its right to close the Account.”

Had we bounced checks? Nope, not a one. Were we a difficult customer? Definitely not. Had we done anything to warrant the bank to close our account? No, but obviously something upset the banking powers to be. The VP for Bank Security, who ordered the letter, told us that they had investigated our business and said that the “nature of our business” was too risky for them. Of course the bank’s action is clearly the result of someone calling the bank and telling them to close our account. Probably the same person who told the US Mint to issue their warning. The same person who told CBS Lies (not worthy of “News”) to do their dirty work. The same person who urged the Washington Post to write their propaganda to kill the Liberty Dollar idea. The same morally corrupt person who might even be reading this Newsletter.

The Liberty Dollar is clearly under siege. Quite simply, without a bank account and merchant card services, it is all but impossible to do business in this day and age. We face the real possibility that the Liberty Dollar could die… and put all the ideals it stands for at risk! A very sobering thought I dare say.

Does this alarm you? I hope! It should alarm you that the government can single out a business without any past criminal history, indictment, or even criminal intent and instruct its bank to close its account! As you can note in Article #3 below, the US Mint does acknowledge that the gold and silver paper certificates are 100% legal. So if one form of the Liberty Dollar currency is legal, what’s wrong with the gold and silver that backs it up? I hope this latest bank development signals you that we need to find a much broader base of support for the Liberty Dollar. It should alarm you enough to take action. I am urging you to contact your newspaper, the organizations you respect, publications you subscribe to, and any public forums to investigate and report on the Liberty Dollar. We need to develop more awareness about the Liberty Dollar, and we need to do it very quickly. Up to this point the silence from our side regarding the government’s attack on the Liberty Dollar has been deafening. That needs to be corrected.

2. Mike Johnson Resigns

It is with shock and disappointment that I must inform you that Mike Johnson has resigned, telling me he was too “concerned” to be the Executive Director. So now I have to add “courage” to my list of requirements for an Executive Director. Of course this experience cost us a lot of money as we invested in Mike with the idea that he would generate more volume, but that was not the case. In fact, we have very little for his 2-1/2 months on the job. We wish Mike well and are now accepting applications for a new “courageous” Executive Director, please.

3. Treasury Letters

The bank action and Mike’s departure is not all… “threatening” letters have been received via certified mail by all the RCOs and myself from Daniel P. Shaver, chief counsel for the US Mint. The “Treasury Letter” re-hashed the Mint’s warning and informed all of us that the Department of Justice has determined that the Liberty Dollar is illegal as per 18 USC Section 486. Of course, that is grossly erroneous as 486 only pertains to passing or uttering an item of gold or silver as government “coin” “legal tender” or “current money.” The Liberty Dollar has never been passed or uttered as government money and they should know that, hence the use of the propaganda machine to extinguish the Liberty Dollar. I think the government is afraid to take the Liberty Dollar to court because they know the law and know that they cannot get a conviction.

We also received a copy of a two-page letter in reply to Congressman Hostettler’s inquiry to the US
Mint. This “Treasury Letter” signed by none other than Mr. Edmund C. Moy, the new Director of the US Mint, simply re-hashed the Mint’s original warning with a twist. To Mr. Moy’s credit, he acknowledged that, “…paper gold and silver certificates do not appear to be covered by this proscription [486].” Thank you, Mr. Moy, now if you would just please read 486, you would discover that it only applies to counterfeiting and does not apply to the privately issued Gold and Silver Libertys. And as a further extension, 486 does not apply to digital currencies like eLibertyDollar.com, GoldMoney.com or e-gold.com. For a thorough review of 486 and why it does not apply to the Liberty Dollar, please read our Disclaimer(s) and David Rostcheck’s 42-page report at:
http://www.libertydollar.org/ld/faqs/disclaimer.htm.

4. Bernard’s “Second Law of Money”

All this propaganda, Mike’s departure, Treasury Letters, and banking problems have given rise to Bernard’s Second Law of Money: “Any government action that purports to prohibit an American citizen from using a piece of gold or silver (or, for that matter, anything) in voluntary barter transactions between consulting adults is preposterous, antagonistic to a free market, and totally without legal merit.”

The bottom line is that we are not deterred. Like the old German saying, “That which does not kill
you – makes you stronger,” the Liberty Dollar is not going away. What else am I to do? Return to lying on the beach in Hawaii and drinking Mai Tais all day? Well, that may not be so bad… but I still feel the country is worth saving from the evils of fiat government money and hope you still agree. Right now the Liberty Dollar needs your help! Where are the patriotic organizations on this issue? Where are the great free market economists of our time? Where is academia? Where are the churches on the issue of honest weights and measures? Where is the community that supports individual rights? Where is the hard money community? Where is the gold and silver community? Where is the Mogambo Guru when we really need him?!

I strongly feel that this is the time that we must take a stand; otherwise the government may be emboldened to move against gold and silver and damn us to their depreciating money until it is too late for our country – and the ideals it once stood for – to survive. I remain steadfastfully optimistic that all this will turn out to be an opportunity as yet unseen…. if you take a stand for the right to use gold and silver as money. Again, I strongly urge you to contact your newspapers, organizations, publications, post to email lists, and any forums and urge them to investigate and report on the Liberty Dollar. We need to get the Liberty Dollar published. We need to develop much more awareness about the Liberty Dollar and we need to do it very quickly. Please take action. Do something!

5. New Vanity Number: 888.LIB.DOLLAR

Seems like no shortage of problems this past month. Even renting our vanity phone number 800.NEW.DOLLAR became a problem. So we bought our own number: 888.LIB.DOLLAR. Please change the number on your site or wherever it is used to the new number. And God help anyone who rents the old number… as it is on thousands of Silver Libertys and they are not going to change any time soon. The 888.421.6181 on all the paper currency is still working… and the local number: 812.473.5250 is also working. [/size]

6. Hawaii Dala Announced

So what do I do in my spare time? Recently when I had a couple of days, I went to Hawaii for the weekend and launched a Hawaiian version of the Liberty Dollar.

Announcing the new 2007 Hawaii Dala featuring King Kamehameha on the obverse with a Face Value of $20 so if you are inclined, you can actually use it as voluntary kala because one Hawaiian Dala is equal to one US dollar. Check out the photos:
http://www.libertydollar.org/press-kit/images/fullsize/2007HawaiiDalaKamObv.jpg
http://www.libertydollar.org/press-kit/images/fullsize/2007HawaiiDalaRev.jpg

What is to come? A lot! The six historic mega designs I did for the 30th anniversary for the old Royal Hawaiian Mint in 2004 will be issued in three sizes for a total of 18 issues. One design per size per month. The six designs are: Kamehameha, Liliuokalani, Kalakaua, Kaiulani, Warrior, and Discovers. The three sizes at the current $20 Silver Base will be: one ounce $20 Hawaii Dala, a half ounce $10 Hapalua Dala, and a quarter ounce $5 Hapaha Dala. All in .999 fine silver. [/size]

In addition to each of these 18 silver Dala issues, a minimum of 100 of each issue will be hallmarked with a micro hand stamp with the outline of the Hawaiian Island to denote First Day of Issue. And an additional minimum of 100 will also be hand numbered 001 to 100 with the FDI hallmark. Both of these Limited Issues will be available at a premium to Face Value and market priced.

If you wish to order a hallmarked or numbered Hawaii Dala, please contact me directly via email.

7. Signs and Shirts by Jeff

A lot of people have done a lot of development for the Liberty Dollar. But none have more than the
amazing Jeff Kotchounian our favorite RCO in Michigan. Here is a list of the 12″ X 18″ Liberty Dollar signs made with HammerMill 100 lb paper, Laminated with 5 mil plastic. There are one sided and two sided signs.

  1. Sign with “Toll Free Number” at the bottom. $2.00 each
  2. Sign with “Available Here” at the bottom. $2.00 each
  3. Sign with “Accepted Here!” at the bottom. $2.00 each
  4. Sign with “Accepted Here!” on both sides. $3.00 each
  5. Sign with “Accepted Here!” on one side AND the Toll Free Number on the other. $3.00 Please note that the new signs have the 2006 dated Gold Liberty.

Jeff can put gromments on the signs for .25 each and has suction cups to hang the signs from the grommets for .40 each. Jeff also has a ton of t-shirts, long sleeve shirts, mouse pads, Liberty Dollar holders, signs, banners and many other custom Liberty Dollar items. I encourage you to visit his web site at: http://www.chooney.com/liberty/productpage.html
and contact him via email at chooney@cardina.net.

8. Letter / Article to the Editor

I am deeply indebted to Kevin Innes, our notable RCO in Asheville and RCO Executive Committee member for this reminder about FEAR.

Fear is also a Weapon

This is a period in human history when, once again, public perception of reality is manipulated. The acronym: “F.E.A.R: False Evidence Appearing Real” is a useful reminder to check yourself in case fear wells up inside you. Those in power are very adept at using fear to keep us all in check and NOT do the things that need to be done to pull us out of this morass.

Information is exaggerated, distorted, concocted and processed for maximum effect: domination and profit. Each of us has a choice to either succumb or rise about those fears. Which do you choose? Controlling the flow and intensity of information/misinformation about what new fear we should have is the main weapon of those who want power over you. Yes, there are horrible things happening to many people around the world and in your neighborhood but what about the countless acts of courage, generosity and care expressed by countless people and movements that are igniting people to action as a result and doing the work that is inspiring countless others to take action for our planet? We don’t hear about that, as much do we? When what you fear is confronted with both feet on the ground – face to face – in broad daylight – you realize the folly of that emotion. It is self-destructive! You realize that Fear inhibits the taking of actions that would allay that fear, for example, to find out if the facts are even accurate; to find out if the power that threatens you is fearful itself. You will find out that the indomitable spirit within you is more powerful than that which you (used to) fear.

The ability to create anything but 100% backed money is at the very core of their power. Now is the time to be bolder and smarter in our actions to establish integrity in the financial arena. It is time to shake off the shackles of self-doubt and come forward, with all our little imperfections, and be brutally honest with ourselves and with others and admit that we don’t have all the answers but we have the
will to keep working tirelessly and in a united way to develop better solutions for a better future. Great leaders have the humility to admit and learn from their mistakes and move forward – hopefully a little wiser and more effective. The Liberty Dollar is a great opportunity for you to establish yourself as the great person you intended to be in this brief period that you have walked this planet. So onwards – without F.E.A.R! It’s a great time to be alive!

Kevin Innes/RCO can be reached at
kevin@ashevillelibertydollar.com

Please send in your letter or comments
for publication to: info@libertydollar.org

9. Success Story / Incident of the Month

There are no incidents to report so we have this great Success Story:

Dear Liberty Dollar…

First we went to Wal-Mart…

We just received our Associate Kit with our first Liberty Dollars, and we set out today to spend them
locally. We had $40.00 in Liberty Certificates, and two $20.00 Silver Libertys. First we went to Wal-Mart, and made a purchase for $47.75. I gave the young, male checker $40.00 in Liberty Certificates, and $7.75 in Federal Reserve Notes. He looked at the Liberty Certificates and asked if they were traveler’s checks. I replied, “No, they are Libertys.” He said “Do I need to check something?” and I said, “What would you like to check?” He went to check with a manager. He was gone a long time! The line of shoppers behind us got longer while we waited. We watched him show the certificates to a CSM (the first line of management), and then the CSM went to the Customer Service counter. We were wondering if they were calling the police!

Finally, a CSM came to get our cart, and took us to the Customer Service counter. Four women cashiers had gathered there, and a male Assistant Manager. The women all said they had never seen them before, exclaimed how pretty the certificates were and asked us where we got them (I said we got them from NORFED, and the web address is on the certificate). The man was digging in his wallet for $40.00. He hadn’t said a word to us. He gave the cashier $40.00 in Frauds and he took the Silver Certificates. The cashier told me that he wanted them to give to his grandchildren.

Then my husband Alex took a $20 Silver Liberty out of his pocket and dropped it on the counter where the silver rang out. He said to the Assistant Manager, “Maybe you would rather have silver.” The guy’s eyes bugged out! He said he would be right back. We think he went to borrow $20 from a friend! He came back and bought the $20 Liberty from us. We then explained to him what it was all about, and told him how he could be an Associate and make money like we just did. Alex also explained how Wal-mart could make a profit with Libertys if they signed up to be a Liberty Merchant. He took our brochure (with our contact information on it) and said he would check it out. One of the cashiers asked for NORFED’s phone number (we gave her a business card) in case Wal-Mart gets more Libertys.

We then went to the health food store where we spent $20.27. I did the drop and gave the young checker our last $20 Silver Liberty and waited. The owner of the store was 10 feet away, helping another customer. The young woman looked at it, hesitated just a moment, and said, “Where is the
27 cents?” I fumbled and gave it to her, and we left without saying anything to the owner. We shop there often so as soon as our next order of Libertys arrives in about a week, we’ll go back to the store and talk to the health food storeowner about becoming a Liberty Merchant.[/size]

My heart was pounding a little at first, but we had a great, fun time and can’t wait to go shopping with Libertys again![/size]

Alex and Jan Salsbery
Susanville Liberty Associate

10. Question of the Month

QUESTION: I have been all through your site… and I see that the government has said that the Liberty Dollar is legal many times. Why have they changed their tune?

ANSWER: Good question! Some people think it was because of our “in your face” Press Conference on August 9, right in front of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in Lower Manhattan. Other people think it was just the fact that we have grown big enough to be noticed. And still others think it is because the gold and silver market is getting ready to blast off and the government may want to try and control it…. and can’t with people using Liberty Dollar free and easy as it is now. “Why” is anybody’s guess. The main point is that why does not matter. What matters most is that the Liberty Dollar IS legal and you should exercise your right to protect your money as best you can… and
certainly the Liberty Dollar is ideal because you can get it at a discount and use it at a profit… so you can grow your money back to total value… just like it could happen for the country at large.

11. Liberty Associate of the Month

What the hell are you?! Maybe you are a Republican? If so, wake up! As we are a long way from any
“Republican” ideal. How about a Democrat? No difference for the well informed, as it is common knowledge that both organizations are controlled by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Hence the saying that it does not matter who you vote for – you get the same old government. Frankly, I would not be one of these damn titles if my life depended on it. And ditto for our very noteworthy Liberty Associate of the Month. Since way back to September 12, 1995, around the time of the birth of the popular Internet, this outstanding Associate has been preaching “Constitutionalism.” And I could not agree with him more. For that reason and a thousand more reasons, like he has a Liberty Dollar banner and link on his home page (as hopefully we all do), I am very proud to acknowledge Jon Roland as the Liberty Associate of the Month.

Jon defines “constitutionalism” as a commitment to strict enforcement of a written constitution of government as it was originally understood by its framers and ratifiers, then its opposite is the doctrine and practice of “legal realism,” which holds that the “law” is whatever judges do or can be expected to do, whose main tenet is the doctrine of stare decisis as presently practiced, and which is fundamentally in conflict with adherence to a written constitution.[/size]

Over 1,000 web sites from around the world (sites like George Mason University and the US Department of State) currently link to Jon’s web site: www.constitution.org.
And when I visited it recently there had been over 1.6 MILLION unique visitors! Please support Jon’s effort. Visit his site and send some eLibertyDollars to jon.roland@constitution.org.

Congratulations Jon! It is wonderfully good Americans like you who make the Liberty Dollar great. Thank you for helping return America to value – one dollar at a time.

12. Quote of the Month

“Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty.” Thomas Jefferson

Closing Remarks:

As we edge up to 2007, I wonder what the New Year will bring? 2006 has certainly been a hell of a year. As many of us know, it has not been a simple task to introduce a new value based currency and save America before its debt-ridden economy self-destructs. I am sure there some amazing things to come and will hopefully provide yet unseen opportunity.

Many thanks to all the Liberty Associates, Merchants, and RCOs for your continued support. For it is only by banding together and adopting a free and independent currency which provides us with “just weights and measures” will we be able to throw off the yoke of a manipulated monetary system and generate a peaceful and prosperous society.

Thank you again for all your efforts to return America to value – one dollar at a time!

And last but certainly not least, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas!

Bernard von NotHaus
Monetary Architect/Editor
www.LibertyDollar.org
888.LIB.DOLLAR
888.421.6181



“May you live in interesting times” to quote the ancient curse. I think we’ve found ourselves in the midst of some interesting times here.

How Would Your Favorite Superhero Vote?

Heard this blog entry quoted on Free Talk Live. Too Funny.

Election Day 2006 – Whose Side is Your Favorite Superhero on?

It’s times like these that make me wonder how superheroes would vote. Is Captain America a Republican or a Democrat? What about Batman? It’s tempting to attribute one’s own political beliefs to one’s childhood heroes, but that would be wrong. We’re in a No-Spin Zone here at Dave’s Long Box, so I have examined the evidence and decided on a political party affiliation for some of my favorite heroes without regard to my personal beliefs.

Hulk the Libertarian. “Hulk just want to be left alone!”
He’s not the only one that qualifies, though.

US Mint vs. ALD: More Press

More stories in the press on the subject of the recent announcement from the US mint. There isn’t as much attention being paid to this as I would like, but it still appears to be making a few headlines. 33 hits today, quite a step up from the 4 or 5 of a few weeks ago.

It’s still nothing more than a threat. No arrests made, no further elaboration from mint officials on the glaring errors in their statements. This shouldn’t be surprising to anyone who is familiar with the problems that We the People has been having getting their very simple questions answered.

But, like the tax protest movement’s problems, the law relating to money in the US is not exactly clear on the subject. Well actually, it’s quite clear on the subject, it just isn’t being followed by the Federal Reserve or the gov’t of the US. If it was, there would be no need for alternative currencies like the Liberty Dollar. The US dollar would provide a store of value like real money does. Inflation wouldn’t occur. We wouldn’t be in anything approaching the financial mess that this country is in right now.

Anyway, here’s a few of the stories I’ve run across.


Liberty Dollar medallions could land coin collectors in jail Trots out the 7 year old hatchet job from the Southern Poverty Law Center as part of the argument against the Liberty Dollar. Other than that it’s rather even handed.

The Washington Post says: ‘Liberty Dollars’ Can Buy Users A Prison Term, U.S. Mint Warns. But they only quote the same tired sources who misquoted the constitution in their original press release, and the above referenced hatchet job. No additional information, and much more negative than the Missoulian article.

As bad as the article is at the Washington Post, it’s nothing like the entrapment and complete mischaracterization that plays out on this video from WCBS. I’m actually embarrased for the reporter who did this story. Is this what passes for journalism these days?

On a completely different note, the Philadelphia Inquirer wants to know: Is it sounder than a dollar? and quotes one of my more favorite statistics:

To use a concrete example, in 1948, gasoline sold for 25 cents a gallon, so a buck bought four gallons.

The dollar of that era was a silver certificate backed by just over three-quarters of an ounce of silver. That same quantity of silver still buys about four gallons at today’s prices – proof, say Liberty’s advocates, that precious metal retains its value while Federal Reserve notes, which they derogatorily call “FRNs,” diminish in value the moment they hit the street.

In what can only be called a positive piece for the Liberty Dollar. About the only article I’ve read that doesn’t toe the gov’t line on the illegality of using Liberty Dollars in transactions. I hadn’t realized that the gov’t had outlawed the barter system. I think they’ll have a hard time enforcing that.

Finally, UPI posted this last Wednesday, which has been picked up in several media locations:

U.S. Mint: ‘Liberty Dollars’ a buck short

WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 (UPI) — Alternative “Liberty Dollar” coins being circulated have prompted the U.S. Mint to remind users they can lose their liberty for five years for using them.

The silver and gold coins are produced at the private Idaho mint of the National Organization for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act and the Internal Revenue Code, The Washington Post reports.

They first appeared in 1998 as the brainchild of NORFED co-founder and “monetary architect” Bernard von NotHaus, who claims on the group’s Web site the coins are a hedge against inflation.

The group claims to have more than $20 million in Liberty coins and notes in circulation, which is a bane to U.S. Mint officials.

“Merchants and banks are confronted by confused customers demanding they accept Liberty Dollars. These are not legal coin,” mint spokeswoman Becky Bailey told the Post, adding users could face a 5-year prison sentence.

In response to a public warning issued by the Mint, NORFED responded on its Web site, saying: “Here it is in plain sight … the Liberty Dollar is not a coin, not legal tender, and backed with inflation proof gold and silver!”

A buck short, indeed. As if the mint has any idea what the value of a dollar really is. A deer skin (a ‘buck’) goes for a good bit more than a dollar these days. I think they need to arrest a few people. Let’s see how strong thier case is.

Shot across the bow: ALD usage is a crime?

This is a troubling development: Liberty Dollars Not Legal Tender, United States Mint Warns Consumers But the troubling part isn’t in the headline, it’s at the end of the press release:

NORFED’s “Liberty Dollar” medallions are specifically marketed to be used as current money in order to limit reliance on, and to compete with the circulating coinage of the United States. Consequently, prosecutors with the United States Department of Justice have concluded that the use of NORFED’s “Liberty Dollar” medallions violates 18 U.S.C. § 486, and is a crime.

This represents a reversal from previous rulings from the gov’t; which has, up to this point, given the alternative currency movement a pass. Referencing the code, this appears to be the pertinent section:

TITLE 18
PART I -CRIMES
CHAPTER 25 – COUNTERFEITING AND FORGERY
§ 486. Uttering coins of gold, silver or other metal

Whoever, except as authorized by law, makes or utters or passes, or attempts to utter or pass, any coins of gold or silver or other metal, or alloys of metals, intended for use as current money, whether in the resemblance of coins of the United States or of foreign countries, or of original design, shall be fined under this title [1] or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

But, I would like to know, how do they plan to enforce this? If I want to accept silver for my services, I’m not sure that they have any grounds for prosecution, short of a sting operation.

There is also the issue of use of the term “current money”, which is essentially defined as “legal tender”. Not a term used to describe Liberty Dollars.

If they wish to broadly interpret current money to include ALD, then it also applies to any token used in any business that substitutes for a fixed amount of cash; car wash tokens, bus tokens, arcade tokens, etc.

Maybe the mint and the justice department should have read the disclaimer on the Libertydollar.org website. They might have realised that this issue has been researched already.

“Gold and Silver Libertys are neither legal tender, money, “current money” nor coins; they do not resemble nor appear to be coinage minted, issued, authorized, or approved by any government agency; and do not relate to taxation or avoidance of taxation. They are privately minted one-ounce gold and silver examples of the goods on deposit for the warehouse receipts distributed by NORFED.”

Henceforth, all Gold and Silver Libertys will be provided with the clear understanding that it is NORFED’s intent that all Gold and Silver Libetys are provided as examples of the goods on deposit for the warehouse receipts distributed by NORFED. Of course, what you and thousands of other freedom loving, consenting adults choose to do in response to the government’s fiat money is beyond NORFED’s ability or duty to police.

The International Libertarian has an entry on the subject, as well as several pertinant quotes from Federal Reserve spokesmen (and others) who reviewed the currency and found nothing illegal about it.

I guess we’ll just have to wait and see if this amounts to anything more than sabre-rattling.